50 signatures reached
To: DAVID CAMERON
PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO THE CONDUCT OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
Initiate a public inquiry into the conduct of the ICO Office and in particular the Illegal Use of section 14 (1) vexatious decisions handed down on a whim by the ICO and other Public Authorities.
There is credible evidence the ICO are acting in consort with HM Judges to pervert the course of justice and in particular the consistent breach of section 77 of the FOIA 2000
There is credible evidence the ICO are acting in consort with HM Judges to pervert the course of justice and in particular the consistent breach of section 77 of the FOIA 2000
Why is this important?
The transparency and accountability of the ICO is under the spotlight because section 14(1) VEXATIOUS decisions are being handed down on a whim by the ICO/Upper Tribunal and First Tier Tribunal and hundreds of rogue Public Authorities.Ditto for section 12(4)(b( of the EIR Act 2004.
All these vexatious decisions are being handed out based on a court authority GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO and Devon County Council ,which is still before the European Court of Human Rights
Section 14(1) Vexatious decisions should be a LAST RESORT but since the Dransfield case decision in Jan 2013 it has been used as a FIRST CHOICE Nutcracker.
All these vexatious decisions are being handed out based on a court authority GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO and Devon County Council ,which is still before the European Court of Human Rights
Section 14(1) Vexatious decisions should be a LAST RESORT but since the Dransfield case decision in Jan 2013 it has been used as a FIRST CHOICE Nutcracker.
How it will be delivered
Directly to the Prime Minister