If this outrage is ignored it greenlights repetitions of this behaviour in the future

People's mental health & general wellbeing are deteriorating!

Regardless of the outcome of the petition for the removal of Paula Vennells CBE. One of the people jailed in the Horizon scandal said he didn’t want to see anyone jailed, he said “Hit them in their pockets” The point he made was that the only thing these people understand is money, Being stripped of her CBE wont really hurt Paula Venelles but taking almost half a million pounds from her will sting quite a bit and last a lifetime. Angela van den Bogerd should also suffer similar humiliation. Lets be honest if they pursue any of the officials through the courts it will take years and result in very little if any justice for the Sub-Postmasters. Please share this petition on all social media outlets to promote this far and wide, lets see what we can achieve.

The success of Gwyneth Hughes' drama starring Toby Jones, Mr. Bates vs The Post Office, which has just aired in January 2024, is inspirational. For so long, so many people have felt powerless, frustrated and angry with our politicians who just seem absorb our ire like a sponge and show no sign of contrition, acceptance of culpability or, indeed, action. Yet, these dramas have suddenly resulted in a reaction. They have to react! It's an election year! Please help to show that we are not as dumb as they think we are and we do care.

True justice must prevail. So many people in the UK are honoured for so much less….. His Dedication to a cause is beyond what most people would have been willing to do….

Japanese tech company Fujitsu Services developed and began operating the Horizon IT financial software services for the Post Office in 1999. Employees said they reported issues with the software from the start, but claimed the Post Office brushed off their concerns or said the issues were the fault of the individual branch managers CCRC, which reviewed the wrongful convictions, said that “Horizon appeared to have significant bugs which could cause the system to misreport, sometimes involving substantial sums of money which sub-postmasters found difficult to challenge as they were unable to access information about the software to do so.” As a result, between 1999 and 2015, more than 700 sub-postmasters were accused of wrongdoing, leading to prosecutions, criminal convictions and, in some cases, prison sentences, the BBC reported. Since the post office scandal has gone viral following the court case and itv show despite Rishi Sunak saying he is looking to exonerate the sub postmasters the post office as noted on the gov website have extended the Horizon Data Centre Operations and Central Network Services as of April 2023 and should be revoked immediately and Fujitsu must take accountability. Justice for the 700+ sub postmasters who were wrongly accused of stealing and for Fujitsu to take accountability for their actions in the creation of the system and the Post Office to revoke this abhorrent contract that ruined so many lives.

Evidence has been produced that the Post Office engaged in a mass cover up which led to the unjust prosecution of over five hundred Post Office Staff Twenty years after he lost his own Post Office, Alan Bates is still fighting for compensation for the hundreds of other victims. The Post Office blamed three thousand five hundred Postmasters for financial losses caused by the Horizon IT system. Seven hundred were found guilty of crimes, two hundred and thirty-six went to prison. Four Postmasters took their own lives. The Court of Appeal has so far overturned ninety-three wrongful convictions. The Public enquiry that Alan Bates called for in 2009 is now underway. Of the five hundred and fifty, who fought along side him in the high court, eighteen have died without seeing justice or full compensation. To date, no current or former Post Office executive has faced criminal charge. The people responsible for this travesty must be held accountable. The innocent victims must be exonerated and fully compensated without further delay.

Justice has not been done for most of those affected and as the responsible body you will be eager to ensure this happens. Funding a further series will be more effective than any other conceivable government action. Just make sure you give them full editorial freedom, you wouldn’t want to reduce its effectiveness by interfering. Image credit: UK Parliament. Used under Creative Commons

Defiant Sports are a Community Interest Company that provides fully inclusive access to a variety of sports regardless of ability or disability. They are a much loved and invaluable local service provider for many disabled and disadvantaged individuals, families and communities. This vital service is now under threat due to council actions. Those responsible need to be held to account and the people of Eastbourne need transparency over what is happening with the Fort Fun site and why the whole matter has been handled so appallingly via a public meeting. Just before Christmas 2023 Defiant Sports were told by Eastbourne Council that they would have to vacate the Fort Fun Site (a previously derelict amusement park located on Eastbourne Seafront). Yet just 12 months earlier the council had highly praised their plans for the site (which had the potential to make Eastbourne an attractive equal opportunities resort for disabled people) when they announced they were to be awarded a joint 5 year lease, along with Wingrove House. The group achieved this after a long and arduous bidding process where various local charities, not for profits and small enterprises had been encouraged to apply for the opportunity to develop the site and to submit plans of intent. The bidding process and criteria were unclear, the process was dragged out with deadlines moved and decisions continually delayed, some bidders only finding via Facebook that their bid would be rejected as they had asked for a long term lease and then discovered that the council only intended to award a short term 5 year lease. During the bidding process there was much disquiet on social media as to why the council was not looking for a major funder and questions were asked as to why only a short term lease was being offered. Councillor Robert Smart made it clear to some seafront groups this was because there was a chance that in the future the Eden Project might be interested in the site. This has been reinforced by his statement to the press this last week and in discussion with two constituents in a Meads conservative councillor surgery. When Council leader, David Tutt made the announcement that Defiant Sports would have the site, shortly before the local elections, he spoke glowingly about the plans they had put forward. Loretta and her team immediately started ploughing a load of resources and manpower into realising their vison for the site. The council failed to fulfil its duty to provide access to water or electricity or any planning permissions necessary for them to make any real headway despite frequent requests and the fact that these were based on the submission which had led to the council awarding them the lease in the first place. Without these permissions Defiant Sports could not apply for the grants which they had made clear to the council were necessary to realise their ambitions. Their hands were tied. Despite this they made a huge visible impact on the site, clearing much of the external structures, dismantling equipment and having much of the site waste, in the area allocated to them, removed. Amidst this process the council suddenly decided to change the area Defiant Sports had been allocated but in the ensuing months failed to define how they were going to do this - again leaving Defiant Sports unable to move forward. However much of the site had been visibly cleared by them. This was in stark contrast to Wingrove House, with whom they shared the site. Wingrove House had been awarded part of the site 6 months earlier than Defiant Sports with the, now retired, Councillors Burton and Tutt promising that their part of the site would be open by September 2022. Yet 18 months on and Wingrove House have not opened any part of their section of the site. However, despite all of this, the council have inexplicably announced that they are now awarding sole use of the site to Wingrove House and Defiant Sports are being forced to vacate it. Having focussed so much time and energy on this project - which it now appears the council had absolutely no intention of letting them realise - the group find themselves in financial difficulties and having to drastically reduce the services it offers. This abysmal near destruction of a small worthy community group that provides such a unique and necessary service to many local families, individuals and communities is reprehensible. The council need to be held to account for the total mismanagement of this process, reparation needs to be made to Defiant Sports and an alternative venue urgently found for them. Explanations also have to be given as to why Wingrove House now has sole use of the site and why does the site seem to be being reserved just in case the Eden Project want it in the vague future with no open, national tendering process. Please sign and demand the council: • compensate Defiant Sports for all the work they have done on the site over the last 12 months (estimated at £75k) • find them suitable alternative accommodation as a matter of urgency so they can restore some of their programme and support the disabled and disadvantaged in our community. • Request the council hold a public meeting with all the relevant councillors and officers there so we, the people of Eastbourne, can get some transparency over what the council's rationale was, what their intentions are, what it is that the Eden Project might have in mind, and open details over the results of the Eden Project feasibility study on which the council have spent £150k.

It is imperative that we come together to especially advocate for the human right of choice in care and on behalf of those who have suffered the injurious torture and harmful after affects of; seizures, memory loss, loss of cognition, confusion and sickness. We ask that this procedure is discontinued.

This is to send a clear message that there should be genuine punishment for those who cause others to suffer so much.

Alan Bates fully deserves recognition. Highlighting those who were and are the problem deserve likewise.